Site Search

Custom Search

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Nycole Turmel slams Tory plans to give B.C., Alberta and Ontario fairer representation

Never ones to worry much about democratic principles, the New Democratic Party, through its Quebec separatist-sympathizer and interim leader Nycole Turmel says fairer representation for British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario in the House of Commons “is really divisive right now. It’s not constructive, it’s not nation-building.”

“The Tory government proposed legislation in 2010 that would expand the 308-seat chamber with 18 new Ontario seats after the next scheduled redistribution, which would be based on the 2011 census, giving it 124 MPs. B.C., which had 36 seats, would get seven more seats, while Alberta would go from 28 MPs to 33.”

– Canada.com

This is rich, wouldn’t you say, coming from the same Nycole Turmel whose past membership in the Bloc Québécois and a Quebec-based separatist party raised questions this summer about her commitment to a united Canada.

By some tortured logic, Turmel sees, as divisive, legislation to redistribute House of Commons seats to ensure that fast-growing provinces are adequately represented in the Commons.

Of course, one has to consider that Turmel was a labour union leader and, therefore, a stranger to democratic representation. Most of us who worry about such things as fair representation believe votes across Canada should have similar weight. The Tory legislation, which Turmel opposes, is designed to do just that.

As things stand, some seats in large urban centres in Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta have three times as many voters as some rural ridings, especially in Atlantic Canada. This imbalance penalizes the faster-growing cities of Ontario and the West and discriminates against the voters who live there.

In the last Parliament, Prime Minister Stephen Harper tried to “rebalance” the House by expanding the number seats as follows: 18 for Ontario, seven for British Columbia and five for Alberta. Quebec and some rural MPs opposed the move because their relative influence in the House of Commons would decline.

Now that the NDP caucus has been hijacked and led by so-called soft-sovereignists (and some hard one too, I’m sure), the idea that Quebec will have roughly equal representation in the House of Commons is distasteful to them, notwithstanding the fact that the principle of representation by population is a cornerstone of Canada’s democracy and is at the root of the electoral system in Canada.

Yes, there has to be compromise, just are there is in the cases of Prince Edward Island, which receives greater representation because if its very small size, and Ontario, which is under-represented because if its large size. But there seems little justification for creating an artificial imbalance in Quebec’s favour thereby rewarding that province’s inability to attract newcomers.

Nycole Turmel and her NDP followers must decide whether they believe in a strong, democratic, united Canada and are a party capable of representing all Canadians, or whether they wish simply to be a Bloc Québécois-like regional party—or perhaps Nycole Turmel, as her rhetoric suggests, has already made the latter choice for them.

 

 

© Russell G. Campbell, 2011.
All rights reserved.
 
The views I express on this blog are my own and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of political parties, institutions or organizations with which I am associated.

7 comments — This is a moderated blog and comments will appear when approved. Please don’t resubmit if your comment doesn’t appear immediately, and please do not post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.

  1. Why don't we just make French the sole official language of Canada and then demand that all immigrants have the ability to speak,or the desire to learn,French rather than English. That wouldn't be divisive and after twenty years of such a language policy the rate of growth in the Rest Of Canada would be the same as Quebec and we might even be able to reduce seats in the House of Commons. Then we'd all get along just fine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I honestly wish her luck on the separatist front. We can not get rid of quebec soon enough as far as I am concerned.

    Rob C

    ReplyDelete
  3. So NDP supporters - how do you feel being taken for granted and owned by the Quebec First Party? lol This political nonsense is going to play so well in the ROC. Cheers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Is she saying that the ndp has little to no chance of winning these seats. I thought Jack said he would grow the party in the west. Guess he knows that wont happen.

    ReplyDelete
  5. maryT,

    Gilles Duceppe's father was Jean Hotte-Duceppe and he was well known in Quebec having done over 160 plays on radio, television and in films, including staring roles.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for that info re Duceppe's dad.

    ReplyDelete
  7. All this absurd bickering over what should be a fundemental democratic principle is just sickening.

    If we need a chamber that is based primarily on provinces or regions, we should fix the Senate to serve that purpose. Having the HoC serve as a sort of hybrid between representation by population and regional concerns is a perversity.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis