Site Search

Custom Search

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Bye, bye Libby, hello Nycole?

NDP Davies_Turmel
Photo credit – © House of Commons

As 68-year-old Hull-Aylmer MP Nycole Turmel takes centre stage in Ottawa as leader of the official opposition, I can hardly wait for the new parliamentary session to begin in September. It won’t be long before the Conservative government confronts the federal public service as it seeks to lower the deficit by downsizing government, and Turmel will undoubtedly be called upon by the NDP to give voice to its contrary position.

Former union boss Turmel can take much of the credit for the fact that wages and benefits of Public Service Alliance of Canada’s members have far outstripped that available in the private sector. (The Public Service Alliance of Canada is the country’s main union of federal employees and Turmel served as its president for six years, until 2006, after nine years as vice-president.) Having her in the House defending the union’s position against the broader interests of ordinary Canadians should provide some excellent political theatre.

Nycole Turmel’s elevation to the New Democrats top job—albeit temporarily—should put paid to any ambitions Vancouver East MP Libby Davies has to ever lead that party. And that’s a good thing.

A little over a year ago, there were calls for Davies to step down as deputy leader of her party after she suggested Israel has been occupying territory since the country came into existence in 1948. At that time, the then Liberal foreign affairs critic Bob Rae denounced Davies’ comments, writing in a statement:

“To deny the state of Israel’s right to exist and to propose an international campaign of boycotts, divestments and sanctions against a legitimate member of the world community for over 60 years is to reveal a level of hostility and ignorance that is truly breathtaking.”

Later, in a media scrum, Mr. Rae argued that Davies’ comments were not simply a slip of the tongue and called for her to step down as deputy leader. Prime Minister Stephen Harper also called for Davies’ resignation as the NDP’s deputy leader. NDP Leader Jack Layton defended Davies, but described her statements as a “serious mistake.” And he, apparently, called the Israeli ambassador to clarify his party’s position.

Readers may also remember that in June 2008 Davies delivered a Parliamentary Petition in the House of Commons demanding a new 9/11 investigation. The petitioners asserted, in part, that:

“…elements within the US government were complicit in the murder of thousands of people on 9/11/2001. This event brought Canada into the so-called ‘War on Terror,’ it changed our domestic and foreign policies for the worse, and it will continue to have negative consequences for us all if we refuse to look at the facts.”

It remains an open question whether Libby Davies actually believes such absurdity or if her rabid anti-Americanism just got the better of her judgment.

When earlier this summer Jack Layton named his other deputy leader, Tom Mulcair, to the post of NDP House Leader, he shuffled Libby Davies over to health critic to make room. I expect that the rise of Nycole Turmel will further diminish Davies’ role and give less opportunity for her to spout her absurd and offensive leftist views, which include hard-edged anti-Israel and anti-American sentiments.

As Turmel’s star rises so Davies’ will set—if we are so lucky.

 

 

Contents, except photograph,
© Russell G. Campbell, 2011.
All rights reserved.
 
The views I express on this blog are my own and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of political parties, institutions or organizations with which I am associated.

2 comments — This is a moderated blog and comments will appear when approved. Please don’t resubmit if your comment doesn’t appear immediately, and please do not post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.

  1. Let's hope so ... or not if we want the conservatives to have some time to put in some solidly policies and legislation.

    Libby Davies would have little appeal as a leader of the new caucus, 2/3 in Quebec. As a lifetime activist, she is now more of a party liability who may not appeal as a leader to the NDP who want to pretend that they are a serious opposition party.

    Jack Layton gets it, and I agree that Ms. Turmel is in place mainly to show union outrage to all cuts proposed in the Public Service, the ones for which we Canadians voted. It seems a bit unlikely that Jack will return in 6 weeks - it is too short a time for a recovery from new cancer treatments, so I do hope he takes at least 3-6 months.

    Unfortunately for the NDP, the new leader is most comfortable in French, thus will be overshadowed by the Ontario election issues. Bob Rae might be very happy, as he is much more articulate in both official languages, and he does outrage well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Turmel is an interesting move by Layton. Deputy Leader Libby would fill in until his health return. Layton has been a successful political player.
    1)Appoint a novice who won't outperform him or dismantle his loyalists from key posts
    2)Keep rivals fighting amongst themselves
    3)I am not confident Jack will be back
    3)Muclair QC wing getting nod is too toxic for ROC
    4)Legacy is tricky and this is not similar to a Martin palace coup (yet)

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis