Site Search

Custom Search

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

High crimes and misdemeanors Bev Oda’s actions were not

The rancour among opposition MPs in Ottawa towards the government and Conservatives in general is palpable. Nowhere is this malicious resentfulness more noticeable than in New Democrat member of Parliament for Winnipeg Centre, Pat Martin. Martin has held his Manitoba seat since 1997 and has accomplished little in Ottawa other than becoming somewhat of a media darling who can be counted on for a sound bite now and then.

Martin is a sanctimonious blowhard and bully who uses his membership on Parliamentary committees to browbeat government representatives in a rude and disparaging manner. His shameful sham of a performance during his questioning of International Co-operation Minister Bev Oda on Friday is the latest example of his contemptible behaviour.

During his overly aggressive verbal assault, Martin suggested Bev Oda is a “lousy minister,” the “minister of weasel words” and suggested she was either a “very poor minister or equally poor liar.” And all this from an MP who is not even a voting member of the committee that is considering whether Ms. Oda should be found in contempt of Parliament—he was brought in by the NDP to be their non-voting “hit man” to entertain the media and to humiliate the beleaguered minister to the full extent of his rather limited vocabulary.

The man’s an odious fellow and a bit of a clown who, like most New Democrat MPs, need to find ways to seem relevant to their constituents and Canadians at large. He’s one of those career politicians who’s in the House of Commons because it is the best paying form of employment he’s ever likely to get—that is, for personal gain. It rankles political hacks like Martin that they will never achieve real power and influence in Ottawa and sometimes their envy and personal animosity towards those who hold power gets the best of them.

Now I read the hypocrite is waffling over whether Minister Oda should be found in contempt of parliament, musing to The Globe on Monday, “I think [her alleged transgressions] are sins of omission more than commission and I’m not sure being less than truthful is as serious as offence as an out-and-out lie.”

So why humiliate Minister Oda so? Because Martin’s privileged position lets him, that’s a good enough reason for any bully.

Contempt of Parliament apparently has only been found in two previous cases: Louis Riel and Fred Rose. Louis Riel, a former Manitoba MP, was expelled from the House of Commons in 1874 for leading the Red River Rebellion. Rose was a communist who had been elected to the House in the mid-1940s then expelled and imprisoned.

Can anyone—even mean-spirited opposition MPs capable of virtually anything—find equivalence between these gravely egregious acts and the actions of Minister Oda? High crimes and misdemeanors her actions were not.

Frankly, I doubt the committee will find the minister in contempt. And the opposition really doesn’t have to as they already have what they want now that three opposition members on the committee have agreed the government is in contempt for its failure to release documents on the cost of its law-and-order agenda. But it’s fun to roast a minister now and then. It’s all part of the political game played by these overpaid political hacks putting in time before they retire on taxpayer funded top-hat pensions that very few of the rest of the population will ever receive.

 

© 2011 Russell G. Campbell
All rights reserved.

6 comments — This is a moderated blog and comments will appear when approved. Please don’t resubmit if your comment doesn’t appear immediately, and please do not post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.

  1. The sad part is, they hung Bev Oda out to dry for a month in the media and the damage has been done to her reputation by untruths, so now its time for the coalition to move on to their next victim. Thanks Pat Martin for your part down in the gutter.How come Olivia and Jack are silent on this issue of using a committee for abuse to a woman by their member?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pat Martin is displaying typical bullying behaviour
    odious to Bev Oda at the committee
    then hey I'm one of the few good guys I do not think she should be found in contempt therefore how can I be the BAAAAD guy
    yes we will be sure to trust Pat in the future to behave like a decent human being
    my opinion
    fh

    ReplyDelete
  3. What this reveals to me is that they knew all along that Oda did not explicitly lie -- but once they got the media to bite, they could not let the opportunity pass. I think the media should be ashamed of their role in this witchhunt.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wrote Oda this morning to encourage her and told her that she should run in the next election. I think she will be a stronger minister because of this.

    Clown Party

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very well said. Martin is the NDP's designated bully boy, and media clown. Canadians and Parliament would be a lot better off without the likes of Mr. Martin degrading the whole process. Martin's peculiar angry man behaviour comes across as someone very close to the edge, on the verge of a meltdown.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis