Site Search

Custom Search

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Shouldn’t Egyptians save their cheers for when democracy is achieved?

Egyptians cheer and the world’s media cheer with them. While one can’t help but wish them well in their days of triumph, I do hope such wild jubilation and celebration are not premature.

Realistically though, just what has been accomplished?


Gamal Abdel Nasser
(1918 – 1970)
2nd president of Egypt

Yes, a 30-year despot has been ousted and at surprisingly little human cost. No bad news there. But, from my vantage point, I see a country that has had dictatorships in one form or another for pretty well all of its long, storied history, and I see little prospect of that changing any time soon.

A month ago, the army was the power behind the throne in Egypt; today the army is the power behind the throne in Egypt. That’s what gives me reason to pause and reflect on whether the people of that country are really any closer to democracy than they ever were. The Egyptian army may guarantee stability and a level of security, but that’s a far cry from what I’ve heard and read the ordinary Egyptian wants. Do they really see the exchange of a Hosni Mubarak dictatorship for military dictatorship as a road to democracy? Perhaps it is, but that certainly has not been the case elsewhere.

And remember the Free Officers Movement of Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1952. The Free Officers did not intend to install themselves in the Egyptian government, but to establish a parliamentary democracy. After assuming power, Nasser and the Free Officers expected to become “guardians of the people’s interests” while leaving the day-to-day tasks of government to civilians. Sound ominously familiar? Instead, however, the Free Officers Movement led directly to 60 years of uninterrupted dictatorship in Egypt.

When power is secured by a military junta—even ones helped to power by a popular uprising—that power is seldom relinquish by free elections. And, on the rare occasions when that does happen, the military almost always only allows those who will do their bidding to remain in office after a successful election.

I hope for the best for that hapless land, but fear the worst.

 

© 2011 Russell G. Campbell
All rights reserved.

1 comment — This is a moderated blog and comments will appear when approved. Please don’t resubmit if your comment doesn’t appear immediately, and please do not post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.

  1. Egypt, it appears, that every 30 years or so the steam has to be relieved from the pressure cooker - sort of a cleansing cathartic expression. Which really only changes the appearance but not the reality of who actually is in control. The shift may be from the air force to the army in terms of titular head but that would be about it for hope and change.

    Worked there about 5 years ago for a bit. The unemployment levels of 18 to 34 year old males was dangerously high and couple that (no pun intended) with repressed libidinal energy (no money = no wife) and you have a simmering pot in need of release. They must be a very patient people as the cathartic moment seems to happen only every 30 years or so.

    ReplyDelete

ShareThis